About 2 years ago, Müller Ricci and Wright published a paper that opened a new line of investigation in the field of Fourier restriction: that is, the study of the pointwise meaning of the Fourier restriction operators. Here is an account of a recent contribution to this problem that largely sorts it out.
1. Maximal Fourier Restriction
Recall that, given a smooth submanifold of with surface measure , the restriction operator is defined (initially) for Schwartz functions as
it is only after having proven an a-priori estimate such as that we can extend to an operator over the whole of , by density of the Schwartz functions. However, it is no longer clear what the relationship is between this new operator that has been operator-theoretically extended and the original operator that had a clear pointwise definition. In particular, a non-trivial question to ask is whether for -a.e. point we have
where is the ball of radius and center . Observe that the Lebesgue differentiation theorem already tells us that for a.e. element of in the Lebesgue sense the above holds; but the submanifold has Lebesgue measure zero, and therefore the differentiation theorem cannot give us any information. In this sense, the question above is about the structure of the set of the Lebesgue points of and can be reformulated as:
Q: can the complement of the set of Lebesgue points of contain a copy of the manifold ?